Author Topic: Evans vs Cisse  (Read 635 times)

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Evans vs Cisse
« on: 05-03-2015, 11:17:41 »

Offline kopdude

  • Resident King of Boluda's
  • Owner
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 25927
    • View Profile
    • The bOOTroom
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #1 on: 06-03-2015, 05:09:09 »
I say go with FA "consistency" and it will be 2 games each.
"Or, you could just shut your festering word-hole. For pete's sake, you Mac people are worse than the Jesus people. Not every freaking problem's solution begins with a lower-case i."

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #2 on: 06-03-2015, 08:21:01 »
Minimum is 6 apparently. Was 3 last season but it was doubled. Cisse has admitted the charge and will apparently get 7 games as he had a sending off for violent conduct earlier this season. Laang Baal and Evans denying the charge so far "Evans did not even know he was spitting at the time" said genius potato head.

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #3 on: 06-03-2015, 16:17:12 »
Scholes too saying he spat unintentionally. Spitting is just like breathing you know.

Offline ManxRed

  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 3832
  • You B*st*rds!
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #4 on: 06-03-2015, 17:24:30 »
Scholes should get a ban for spitting too then. Although how he's supposed to have reached Cisse from his spot in the commentary box I've no idea.
Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.

Offline Negative

  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 4430
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #5 on: 06-03-2015, 19:02:27 »
If you lot knew just how poor Evans has been this season, you'd oppose any ban on him.
Stupid reporter: "Can you give us a sense and idea of what your transfer strategy will be?"

LvG: "No."

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #6 on: 06-03-2015, 20:49:29 »
Scholes should get a ban for spitting too then. Although how he's supposed to have reached Cisse from his spot in the commentary box I've no idea.

 (&****)

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #7 on: 07-03-2015, 18:38:51 »
6 games for Evans, 7 for Cisse. Fair enough, though Evans denying the charge should in my book warrant extra punishment.

Offline Nosferatu

  • Administrator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 35627
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #8 on: 08-03-2015, 02:24:13 »
Hmm, I take your point. But what if he is innocent? Disregard this particular incident, going that route means you respect punishment regardless of guilt.

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #9 on: 08-03-2015, 10:09:40 »
Sure though shouldn't admitting before the case is heard then merit a reduced sentence as often happens in a court of law?

Zaph, thoughts?

Offline zaphod

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 10758
  • Half-full
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #10 on: 08-03-2015, 12:16:47 »
- Depends on the frivolity it seems. In this one there was clear video evidence of Evans spitting so IŽd have thought he would get more for trying to appeal a clear case.  In general though, protesting your innocence and fighting your case shouldnŽt affect the outome, unless youŽre obviously trying to bluff and are in contempt
FSG cock-sucker

Offline Nerik

  • Global Moderator
  • Super OOT
  • *****
  • Posts: 45167
    • View Profile
Re: Evans vs Cisse
« Reply #11 on: 08-03-2015, 22:39:00 »
Yeah, can agree with that. Laang Baal and Scholes embarrassed themselves with their excuses.

 

anything